Home » Favorite Apps, Reviews

Pulse vs MobileRSS: Hunt for the best iPad RSS App

One of the first reviews I did for this site after relaunch earlier this year was a rundown of a few RSS reader Apps for the iPhone, by lucky happenstance I found one that suited every one of my needs. For a while. Then, I got an iPad and reading RSS reeds on my tiny iPhone display seemed archaic and I was on the hunt once again for a bigger, better Reader App.

All of a sudden there was a flurry of news about Pulse, the RSS reader that Steve Jobs had used during his iPad demo, and the NY Times fallout therein. Pulse was brought to my attention and I was more than intrigued, “I must try this” I said to myself. And then then said it in email form to the good folks at Alphonzo Labs and they graced me with a promo code.

Unfortunately I couldn’t just dive-in, as Pulse was still very much a work in progress, and did not yet have two of the most important features I need in an RSS App – Google Reader support and offline caching. The second was particularly important to me on the iPad as I have a wifi only version. So i waited patiently for the next update, which promised these features.

In the meantime I was simply itching to try the iPad version of the iPhone App that won the original search into the ideal RSS reader for me – Mobile RSS, who launched their own iPad App, a bigger ‘HD’ version even. However getting in touch with the developers turned into a harrowing experience eventually i did get in touch with them and they were gracious enough to also provide me with a promo copy.

Pulse was updated, boasting of my long awaited favorite features, and the showdown could begin.

(How’s THAT for a preamble to an App Review!)

For the record I did try a couple other Reader Apps, but none came close to being a good as these two, for me. So while you might love Feedler, or NetnewsWire or what have you, I simply didn’t. These are my two top picks, and I’ll tell you why:

Reading

The most important feature of any RSS Reader is the ease and comfort of actually reading your articles. Pulse wins at this. It was specifically designed by people who obviously know how people use the iPad, and how important layout and comfort work together to make a great reading experience. While MobileRSS is just fine I prefer the One-Stop-Shopping as it were of Pulse, having all of my feeds on the left and my current article on the right. With that said – MobileRSS has the built-in ability to flick-scroll between articles from within the article, and I really love that too – so it makes it a much better reading experience in Portrait, while in Pulse you need to bring up your current feed menu to choose the next article.

Winner: Pulse (Landscape), MobileRSS (Portrait).

Subscribing to Feeds

I suppose I’ve always taken for granted that I use Google Reader. I just assume everybody does. However if you don’t then, clearly, Pulse is better for you. While, yes, Pulse did recently add the ability to import your Google Reader Feeds (individually mind you), it’s by and large for users who subscribe to independent feeds – and it makes searching for, finding, and subscribing to feeds super easy with built-in Search. It’s a fantastic stand-alone reader/subscriber. You simply do not have the option to add new feeds from within MobileRSS.

Winner: Pulse.

Google Reader Integration

MobileRSS is, by definition, a Google Reader App, and it’s great at that. Not only does it import and sync all your feeds, it also keeps them categorized by your folders, Giving you the ablity to read an entire folder, or just one feed. It also imports your “Who you’re Following” Folder so you can read your friend’s shared feed items on the go. Pulse only adds your feeds individually and the Google integration ends there.

Winner: MobileRSS

Sharing

Half the fun of reading is sharing, I think everyone can agree. While lots of Apps add Social Media Integration for the sake of Social Media Integration I think that it’s always going to be a necessary component of RSS readers because if the nature of the content itself. It’s simply Sharable.

When it comes to articles Pulse lets you Post to Twitter, Facebook, Email or Instapaper. But that’s not exactly where it’s sharing features end.. if you have Bump you can share your RSS feeds with another iPhone/iPad user via Bump and vise versa.

MobileRSS has a lot more built-in sharing options for your articles, including all of the ones Pulse has, I’ll let you see from the screenshot below, but it’s very unlikely that you’ll be without the ability to post to whatever Social Media site you prefer. In addition, you can always add anything to your Google Reader Shared Feed, which, again is another huge draw for Google Reader users.

Winner: MobileRSS

Now comes the deal-breaker feature for me. While it was important on the iPhone, it’s simply imperative on my wifi only iPad (and I think lots of you who are in the same boat as me will agree);

Offline Reading/Caching

For those of us with wifi only iPads, saving my feeds to read on my daily commute to work is simply mandatory. The reason I’m writing this article now, and not two weeks ago when I first downloaded Pulse, is because I was waiting for its most recent update that claimed to include better offline caching of articles.

While, yes, yes it does cache the articles it does not do one thing, one very important thing (especially for my webcomic feeds). Cache Pictures. This is the exact same issue I came across when trying to find the perfect iPhone RSS reader and I couldn’t be more heartbroken by this. Sure, Pulse may not have the same sharablity factor that Mobile RSS does, but the layout/design and easy of readability was so impressive that I was really hoping to use this as my everyday RSS Reader. Sadly, Mobile RSS Has it beat.

MobileRSS loads and caches all unread articles, including pictures within the article.

Winner: MobileRSS

Cost
At $3.99 or $4.99 there really isn’t much of a difference here. While Pulse seems more like a polished product, and probably worth much more than $3.99, MobileRSS has won the Battle, so it’s really up to you at this point. No Winner.

Judgement

So, in the end, Pulse beautiful, wonderful and definitely one of the best RSS Readers on the market. If you have a 3G iPad and don’t need offline viewing – I highly recommend it. Especially if you subscribe to feeds directly, and want to be able to find & subscribe to feeds from within the App. Visit Alphonzo Labs website to see even more info (the company story is a fun one).

MobileRSS HD is The App for Google Reader users, and wifi only folks like myself. Not as elegant, but very useful, and full of sharing and social features. For now, it will remain my default RSS reader, but will keep you updated if that changes. Here is the link to the Nibiru Tech site.

I’m obviously emotionally invested in this App Category now. Let me know if you’ve tried out either of these, or if you have another option you think I should consider. Comment or Tweet me!

View Comments »

  • macskiman said:

    I can't remember the names of all the many news readers I have tried. Good thing they are not too expensive, since I've wasted quite a bit of money. I keep coming back to Mobile RSS.

    Some of the others look real nice – like real newspapers or newsstands, etc., but MobileRSS just gets the job done. Every feature I have wanted in a newsreader has been added over the last year. I've used it on my iPod Touch, iPhone, and now constantly on my iPad. The in-App browser is excellent and it's nice to be able to send an email from within the App (pretty common now in a newsreader).

    On the iPad, I like Mobile RSS best in landscape mode. The browser side is still plenty large enough to read. I don't scroll through the articles, so need to see the headline list, since there are always lots of items I wish to skip. I doubt I'll ever find an RSS reader that I'll like any better. It sure works for me!

  • Charles Babbage said:

    I use Reeder for iPad. It sounds a lot like MobileRSS, having full article with picture caching (I'm also a wifi only iPad user), full google reader integration and flick-scroll between articles, also flick-scroll horizontally to mark read/unread (which I *need* in a mobile reader). I've tried quite a few (including pulse and mobilerss) and settled on reeder because it works best for me.

    Cheers,

  • ChantelleJoy said:

    To be honest, I didn't try Reeder – however just recently read up about it on the App Store – if it has all the features that MobileRSS has I'm absolutly willing to test it out – thanks for the suggestion!

  • Aslam Nathoo said:

    I would also really like to see a review of Reeder vs. MobileRSS. Can you do that next?

  • ChantelleJoy said:

    I'm looking into it! :)

  • Aslam Nathoo said:

    Hey there… any update on this? Is a comparison of MobileRSS and Reeder for iPad imminent or should I just bite the bullet and buy one of them?

  • Aslam Nathoo said:

    FYI, I just discovered another GReader client for iPad that provides Offline access which you should add to your review: Feedler RSS. The just released 1.5 version adds offline access. They have a free Lite version and a paid ($4.99) Pro version that adds some features. So maybe you can add this to your showdown of the GReader iPad Clients.

  • ChantelleJoy said:

    Aslam – I've been trying to get in touch with the folks at Reeder, and they haven't got back in touch with me. I really wish I could test it out to tell you, I'll keep trying.

    Also: Feedler was one of the iPad Apps I tried before Pulse and MobileRSS, but at the time it didn't offer offline access. Now that it does I'll definitely download it and once (if I ever) hear back from Reeder I'll do a follow-up post with Reeder and Feedler included – until then, honestly, I've been using MobileRSS and loving it. If you're not too concerned about your GReader clients being “pretty”, I can't recommend it enough, I don't think you'll be disappointed.

    (Sorry for the late reply on this comment, apparently Disqus is sending notifications to my SPAM box – Bummer)

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

blog comments powered by Disqus